|
Moeller is best known for his views on how to hold the drumstick, and the motions of controlling the drumstick
during all phases of stick movement.
Moeller’s Method applied mainly to snare drumming, as there were not many drum kits around in the late
1800s and during the early twentieth century! The 'Moeller drum technique' described by Moeller, is setting down what he calls
the 'standard' and 'authentic' drum method that was developed over many centuries.
One may wish to read this article in more than one sitting. In addition to descriptions of the various techniques
that Moeller talks about, there are also many Moeller paraphrases, found in this article, that are taken from the book. They
can be found, here and there, so as to do Moeller's writings justice...
What the Moeller system of drumming represents, to us, is a broad, flexible approach to snare drumming, that
can be used as a basis for other specialized kinds of drumming ... i.e., drum kit, orchestral snare drumming, pipe drumming,
etc.
RUDIMENTS
Assume this as a given ... the first part of learning the 'Moeller method' is to embrace a commitment to
work out regularly using a 'rudimental schedule' of some kind. Moeller was definitely a rudimental enthusiast! Pupils of Moeller
had to become used to practicing drum rudiments on a regular basis, no doubt.
MOELLER
Sanford Moeller thoroughly studied the 'Camp Duty' literature (US Army), because he loved how these drum
beatings could show off the advanced expertise of a drummer. Moeller believed that if anyone could expertly play the Camp
Duty, they should be considered accomplished at the instrument. Examples of those drum beatings, are: ('Three Camps', 'The
Quick Scotch', 'Dinner Call', the classic 'Downfall of Paris' - to name a few ). From history, we know that in the 1920s, Moeller was very vocal and critical of
what he saw. Rudimental shortcuts and unbalanced stickings were turning out weaker (less accomplished) drummers, in his view.
Also, making use of the authentic traditional grips were being ignored. He was not
part of the original 'twenty-six rudiments club', but he definitely supported learning rudiments. His book preceded N.A.R.D.
's foundation by several years! To Moeller, studying rudiments was the very basis needed to build a proficient drummer. The historic group (just mentioned above) was made up of a number of well established drummers who possessed
excellent technical skills. With the help of William F. Ludwig (W.F.L.) (Leedy and Ludwig) (etc.), the group encouraged
younger players to improve themselves by following a practice method that included mastering a list of twenty-six rudiments
(learning the 'thirteen essential drum rudiments' was the first step).
Ever since the days of John Philip Sousa, nearly all young American drummers have been instructed by their
band director (conductor) to study the "scales of drumming", i.e., drum rudiments". Today, with the advent of PAS (Percussive Arts Society) and DCI (Drum Corps International), all parts of the US are populated with drummers who have excellent technical skills. Also, now-a-days,
there exists many more variations and combinations of drum rudiments ... different permutations of those age-old, basic, elemental
strokes and studies.
MORE BACKGROUND
Sanford "Gus" Moeller was first and foremost a rudimental drummer and was definitely a 20th century bridge
to the 'ancients'. Be that as it may, it is common knowledge that Moeller was chiefly responsible for helping to produce the
great early jazz drummers, such as the famous "Sing, Sing, Sing" soloist, Gene Krupa. This is proof that much of the so-called
'Moeller method' can be easily translated to non-rudimental venues (to include the various styles and grips used by well-known
players of the drum set).The Moeller Book·· "The Art of Snare Drumming," was published in 1925 and reprinted
in June 1950 by Leedy and Ludwig ... (followed by - 1956 Copyright assigned to Ludwig Drum Co.), (followed by - 1982 Copyright
assigned to Ludwig Music Publishing Co). There
was a time when this self-teaching method was ONE of the 'necessary THREE' (authors), that serious players would examine.
Half a century ago, techniques from Sanford A. Moeller (The Moeller Book), George Lawrence Stone (Stick Control
) and Jim Chapin ... Jim's independence book for Jazz and Be-Bop Drumming ... were the accepted building blocks
that helped to create the trained, advanced jazz drummers & rudimental drummers of the day.
Do all well-known drummers talk about rudiments? Are rudiments that important? I remember Elvin Jones (when
he played with John Coltrane) telling a clinic, that age old piece of information ... If a drummer practices the double stroke
( Da-Da Ma-Ma Roll) with an accent on the second
note, it produces an improved sound and changes the very way a drum is played.
In other words, learning to cultivate the 'weak' taps, changes one's style (somewhat) regarding
the different ways a drum can be stuck. The exercise also helps to produce the very best tone and enhances technique, such
as speed! Also, the exercise forces the second note of the double to be played as an 'accented up stroke'. This is a very
useful technique to develop!
To sum up, it should be more or less obvious, by now, that Moeller did not teach Gene Krupa how to play a
set of drums ... but rather, he gave Krupa CONFIDENCE. As a result of practicing drum rudiments, he gave Gene Krupa a well
developed snare drum technique. And with that, he helped to give Krupa his jazz drumming career!
During the 1920s and 30s, individuals, such as Sanford Moeller, were the ones who had the 'knowledge'. There
were other drummers out there, certainly, but most did not really know the concept 'practice your rudiments'! They obviously
performed that way, too. Little wonder that
Gene Krupa stood out ... because Krupa could really play a snare drum! (thanks to 'Gus'). This was the point in time
(in the U.S.A.) when the United States military drummers, along with the 'trained percussion specialists in the European classical
tradition, ceased to 'own' (exclusively) the advance technical skills (drum rudiments) needed for accomplished drumming! As we all know, Krupa was not a 'military drummer' or a
classical percussion specialist! His niche was in the popular world. He specialized in dance band drumming and after several
years developed his own band to feature himself. Louis (Louie) Bellson and Benard (Buddy) Rich did the same thing many years
later. It should be remembered, though,
that Krupa's popularity resulted from his applying ancient skills (the rudiments and other techniques from Moeller's lessons)
to the drum set. He is usually thought of as being the first successful drummer to do so.
UP STROKE
One does not have to use a certain stick grip in order to play an up stroke! The up stroke concept, a concept that does not depend on any particular grip, has more to do with eurhythmics. The idea
refers to visualizing the body's movement as 'part of' ... or the 'beginning of' ... striking a drum in the first place! The
up stroke technique was one of the secrets from the 'ancients'. More later.
The 'Moeller book' can only take one so far...
When one thinks about, it is probably more accurate to say that it was Moeller's students who popularized
concepts such as demonstrating one-handed rolls, for instance. Certainly his well-known pupil, Jim Chapin, created a new direction
regarding jazz coordination and jazz drumming techniques.
If Moeller is new to you, you may not know that set drumming is, obviously, not covered in Moeller's book!
Other areas of innovation not talked about in Moeller's writings involve the various 'finger control' methods, and so forth.
In the 'Moeller book', Moeller talks about the chief use of the up stroke technique as follows ... the up
stroke can be used for the second note of a paradiddle and similar sticking situations (not one-handed rolls). Mastering the
up stroke allowed a drummer to render a paradiddle much faster than those drummers who were never taught the technique. This
is also true for the single handed roll.
The 'Moeller system' is FOUNDATION ...
'Moeller techniques' would be an excellent foundation for anyone to pursue, as they are the vary basis of
drumming. Recall learning one's 'letters'. For a few weeks, or longer, we learn, as children, to copy the lettering from a
blackboard. After a while, we make our 'own version' of the letter "B", and not the teacher's, and so on.
Whether or not a drummer personally studied with Moeller, his influence has no doubt reached that drummer
all the same! Buddy Rich comes to mind, for instance. He had an awesome command of the snare drum and the up stroke technique.
His one handed stick taps are well known. He was famous for rendering the up stroke -down stroke combination (the
so called 'Moeller stroke'), with a push-pull maneuver using mostly fingers.
GRIP
After one gets to know Moeller better, it becomes obvious, that ... he would clearly NOT recommend a certain
grip to play a parade drum (field drum)... and then recommend using the very same approach, without any modifications, to
play a '1930s - 1940s set of drums'. These are two different tasks! They require two different approaches ... and 'Moeller's
book accommodates this.
Moeller's preference was to teach the traditional rudimental drummers grip, first. To Moeller, when
playing the rudiments, one should always use the 'little finger grip' ... as it represented a centuries-old school of drumming.
Holding the right stick, 'almost exclusively with the little finger', has come to be associated with Moeller, almost exclusively
(therefore, most say 'Moeller grip'). Many may feel that this is a misnomer.
One must remember, however, that Moeller's specialty was, one player - one drum. Drums that he played on
were always at an angle, and not situated in a more or less flat orientation. From the very beginning of the instrument (now
called the drum kit), drum set drummers usually tilted their snare, until influence from the 'rock genre' began to
take effect in the late 1960s.
For many years, Jim Chapin
has been recommending to drummers that they can definitely learn from Moeller's lessons. Chapin is not like the many percussion
'experts', who casually claim that they 'understand' Moeller as well as anyone (and more often than not, do not).
Jim Chapin studied with Moeller. He was a Moeller pupil for a time. For decades, he has advocated that one
should study the 'ancient' information in Moeller's book . For me, therefore, he has always been the best model and the best
representative to demonstrate the ideas found in Sanford Moeller's writings. The main difference between Chapin and others,
is that he knows where it all came from!!
|